Pedro Martinez

Pedro Martinez is set to be enshrined today in Baseball’s Hall of Fame.  As you know, I’m not a man of words…good words anyway.  That said, watching Pedro pitch was must see viewing.  There have been better pitchers than Pedro in terms of higher cumulative stats but I would argue, there hasn’t been a better pitcher over a 7 year period than Pedro was from 1997 – 2003.  Sandy Koufax comes to mind but his prime was over 5 years.  Both Koufax and Pedro were similar in that they had relatively short careers for Hall of Famers and whose prime years were other worldly.

Consider this, from 1997-2003, Pedro’s stat line was:

W-L 118-36, 1408 IP, 1009 H, 315 BB, 1761 K’s, 2.20 ERA, .940 WHIP, 213 ERA+.

All of this pitching during the steroid era.  Pedro has been quite vocal on his anti-steroid stance and I fully acknowledge that this alone doesn’t mean he didn’t do steroids himself.  But even if he did do steroids (which I don’t think he did, call me biased or naive, fine) he still did things no other pitcher did during or outside of the steroid era.

I isolated Sandy Koufax’s prime years of 1962-1966 and came up with this:

W-L 111-34, 1377 IP, 959 H, 316 BB, 1444 K’s, 1.95 ERA, .926 WHIP, 167 ERA+.

Koufax’s prime came over 5 years and of course he pitched in a time where 300 IP a season was normal.

I’ve looked and admit, probably not thoroughly enough, I haven’t found another modern day pitcher who’s prime was as dominating in all aspects as Pedro and Koufax’s.  ERA, control, strikeouts, ERA+.  Every element of their games was perfect.  I give the nod to Pedro because he pitched in a hitters era and did so over a longer period of time.

As a Red Sox fan, I realized early on that I was watching a player whose performance would probably never be duplicated again by a Red Sox player.  I didn’t have to force myself to watch Pedro’s starts, I had to watch them, I demanded to watch them.  Start after start of mowing the opposition down, Pedro allowing 3 ER was a bit of a shock, if just didn’t happen that much.

His best game were both against the Yankees.  His 17 strikeout, 1-hit win and his head to head match-up game against Rogers Clemens which was won by a late Trot Nixon home run.  Epic baseball.

Congratulations to Pedro Martinez and thank you for making watching baseball such a joy.


There is a report that on the interweb that Luis Severino could be called up next week. That report, plus today’s roster move make me wonder if the Yankees are trying to showcase some players as potential trade chips. Let me explain.

Today the Yankees purchased the contract of Nick Goody from Scranton. It’s a strange move because it required the Yankees to add him to the 40-man roster, at the expense of Gregorio Petit, and he has a grand total of six innings above AA ball. Now those innings have been very good, as have his overall numbers, but why make this move? If the Yankees simply wanted an extra bullpen arm, they could have recalled Rumbelow from Scranton. He is already on the 40-man roster. But they decided to add Goody and give him a shot which makes me think they want to see what he can do and let other teams see him as well.

If I am right, that might also explain Refsnyder’s brief audition and the potential callup of Severino. Get these guys into the big leagues and let other teams get a look at them. It’s not a bad plan, but it will cause some 40-man headaches in the future if they don’t trade some of them.

Phil Hughes

The Yankees face former-prospect Phil Hughes tonight in Minnesota and that got me to thinking about eight years ago and the summer of 2007.

Back then we liked our mortgages big and undocumented, our investment banks as investment banks only, and we were positive that it would be Hillary Clinton versus Rudy Giuliani facing off to become the President in 2008. A-Rod had not been discovered as a cheater and he hadn’t even opted-out of his original contract. Were we ever truly that young?

For Yankee fans that will also be the summer of the three great prospects. The first was Hughes who came up in April, got roughed up a bit, and then was in the middle of a no-hitter when he got hurt. He returned in August, just as the Yankees brought their second big pitching prospect, Joba Chamberlain, to the big league bullpen. In September, we got to see the third guy, Ian Kennedy, join the other two and our dreams went into overdrive. Here were three incredibly young (Kennedy was the oldest at 22) guys who looked like they would make up the top of the rotation for years to come. In fact, if I had bet you that the trio would finish their Yankees’ careers healthy, but with only 80 wins combined, you would have laughed me out of the room.

Yet, that is exactly what happened. For various reasons, none of them came close to being what the Yankees thought they would. In fact, they were all generally disappointments. Hughes came closest to fulfilling his potential leading the trio with 56 wins as a Yankee, but that took seven seasons of very inconsistent results.

I thought about this and I write about it because it is a memory worth keeping this upcoming week. We hear the names, Judge, Severino, Bird, Refsnyder, and we expect to see four superstars in the next few years. That is foolish, it simply won’t happen. If two of those guys become regular and productive big-leaguers, the Yankees will be ahead of the curve. I am not advocating giving up any of those guys in trades, but the Yankees have a legitimate chance to win this year and if increasing those odds requires some prospects to be sacrificed to get increase those chances, the Yankees should do it. As the saying goes, flags fly forever.

Cruel Summer

Bananarama couldn’t have know that their 1983 hit would be the anthem for the 2015 Red Sox.

It is time to be sellers, not that there is much to sell.  Hanley Ramirez is a train-wreck of a left-fielder but can still hit a bit.  Pablo Sandoval has performed about how you’d expect from a player who cares so little for his fitness.  The rotation has been a nightmare (Porcello at $20m a year for the next 4 seasons, oh boy!).  The only real marketable pieces are Koji Uehara and perhaps a contending team in need of some power in Mike Napoli or leadership in Shane Victorino but the Red Sox would assume most of the salary hit.

It is hard to pinpoint just what went wrong with this team, aside from the fact that both the Ramirez and Sandoval signings felt like the signing of Carl Crawford a few years back.

John Henry needs to look at the approach the Red Sox have taken as they are heading for their 3rd last place finish in 4 seasons.  Ben Cherington, Larry Lucchino and everyone else needs to be evaluated and some tough choices are needed.  Doesn’t it feel like winning, while important, is getting tangled up with other things like ratings and marketing deals?  I have no direct proof, but signing two flawed players in Ramirez and Sandoval wreaks of some bean counter/entertainment person asking to buy a reason for fans to tune in.  Except that, winning is what causes fans to tune in, not gimmicks or overpriced hacks.

Despite the sinking ship, there are a few glimmers of hope, not for this season, but for beyond.  Xander Bogaerts has become what we all expected, Mookie Betts has been solid, Blake Swihart has started to hit a bit and Eduardo Rodriguez has surprised.  Now if you look at the above mentioned individual stats, none will overwhelm you or even impress you, but they are all very young (23 or younger) and could develop into the future cornerstones of this franchise.  Ugh.

Makes Sense

I am not alone in feeling that the roster move of Beltran being activated at the expense of Refsnyder was odd. Jack Curry pointed it out on the pregame. Numerous bloggers are furious over it. I agree with all of the criticism that it doesn’t make a lot of sense. But it is important to keep some perspective about it.

This doesn’t mean that Drew is the second baseman for the rest of the year. It doesn’t mean that Refsnyder is gone to the minors for the rest of the season. In fact, Brian Cashman offered a very sensible explanation for the move basically saying that it was about keeping inventory. If the Yankees cut Ryan or Drew, the two most likely moves, they would have one less asset for the upcoming trade deadline. (We can argue the value of those assets at a separate time.) Furthermore, what happens if they get an offer they can’t refuse for Refsnyder himself?

In the context of the 2015 season, this is a smart play. Send Refsnyder down for ten days and see what happens on the trade market. If you don’t find a deal you like, simply promote Refsnyder and cut Ryan (not Drew, Drew is amuch better option with the bat and close to Ryan defensively.) One way or the other, I would bet that Drew is not starting at second when August rolls around.

154 Games?

Reports are that Tony Clark and the MLBPA would like to look at a 154-game schedule the next time the CBA comes up for negotiation. Like the author of the article I linked to, I am very skeptical that this has a chance of being approved by the owners. He points out the three biggest obstacles:

1- Reduced game revenue

2- Reduced product for TV partners.

3- Reduced product for municipalities.

Even if the players agreed to roll back their salaries by 5% (roughly the reduction in the number of games) The loss of gate revenue and TV revenue would make the owners very unlikely to do it. I suggested a number of years ago that MLB should incorporate the WBC into the middle of a 154-game season, but I still don’t think that will happen.

I also question the comment by Tony Clark about the hardships the players face today schedule-wise. Yes, there are some grueling trips, and short turnarounds, but let’s not pretend that these players are not given every amenity possible when traveling. They travel almost exclusively on chartered planes, usually something like a 757 that has been modified with fewer seats. They are put in first-class hotels and they are driven to and from the ballpark in buses when on the road. It’s a pretty comfortable way to travel and certainly beats the trains of yesteryear.

So, I don’t see the need, and I certainly don’t expect to see the schedule roll back to 154 games. What are your thoughts?

Why Not Net It?

A season ticket holder for the A’s sued MLB Monday to get them to install nets from foul pole to foul pole in all ballparks. The suit is not seeking any monetary damages, just the installation of the nets. My question is, why wouldn’t MLB do this?

I have been racking my brain on this issue, and I am having a hard time coming up with a reason. I think every park in the league has put screens in front of the dugouts. That was a sensible move. There is already a net behind home plate, which means in front of the most-expensive seats. I really don’t think it would cost that much to install. Maybe player safety from crashing into the net? But wouldn’t that be preferable to crashing into the stands?

Most importantly, it would protect people from getting hurt. MLB has insulated itself from lawsuits because the back of every ticket tells you “The bearer of the Ticket assumes all risk and danger incidental to the sport of baseball … including specifically (but not exclusively) the danger of being injured by thrown bats, fragments thereof, and thrown or batted balls.” But MLB can’t possibly be that callous about fan safety can they?

I think the lawsuit language also highlights a hugely important fact- people are more distracted than ever at ballgames. Smartphones are everywhere and people are not paying as much attention as they used to. Beyond that though, plenty of fans simply can’t get out of the way. A screaming line drive into the stands, over the dugout, is a potentially deadly missile- no matter how much attention is being paid to the game. So why not add a net and protect the fans?


Break Time

The Yankees took the series from Boston with a somewhat messy victory on Sunday. They head into the All-Star Break with a 3.5-game lead in the AL East.

The story of today is Rob Refsnyder. We saw the good and the bad of him in the span of an inning. In the Top of the 9th, Refsnyder parked one over the Monster. It was a very interesting moment because Girardi easily could have pinch-hit for him with Drew since there was a righty on the mound. (More on that in a minute) In the bottom of the inning, Refsnyder made a bad play covering second on a ball hit back to the pitcher. The official scorer did a good job charging him with the error.

Those two plays reflected the scouting reports about Refsnyder, good hitter, but a so-so fielder. The question is, what will the Yankees do with him now? Girardi’s faith was rewarded with that home run, but the fact that he was willing to let him hit there tells me the Yankees are going to let Refsnyder sink or swim at second and  therefore Steven Drew is no longer a starter.

That makes a lot of sense. Clearly, the Yankees needed to upgrade at second. With a little over two weeks until the trade deadline they get a chance to see if Refsnyder is the answer at second and could make a trade if he isn’t. Drew still has value. He provides good defense at three positions, and he has shown the ability to take advantage of RHP at Yankee Stadium. As far as backup infielders go, the Yankees could do a lot worse.

The only question is will Drew be able to handle it? It’s certainly a blow for a guy to lose his starting spot. One would hope that Drew would recognize that the Yankees have given him 124 games to show them his value and he has hit .171 with 15 homers. That deserves a trip to the bench and the Yankees are smart to do it now and try an internal option first.

Finally, as a fan, this is an exciting time. I was looking at the combination of Didi and Refsnyder today and trying to figure out the last time the Yankees regularly had two guys in the middle of the infield who were under 26. I think it might be Dent and Randolph, but I am not sure. Whatever the answer, the youth movement appears to be gaining steam in the Bronx.


Round 1- New York-UPDATED

My only quibble tonight has to do with the bullpen management by Joe Girardi. A 5-1 victory seems like an odd place to use your three-best relievers.

I’m ok with using Wilson in the 7th, you want to get through that and the score is only 4-1. I am also ok with using Betances in the 8th. Why not shut them down then and head to the 9th up 4? But, I don’t get Miller in the 9th. The only explanation I can think of is that Girardi is ok using Miller for an inning both Saturday and Sunday. If he isn’t, he mis-managed this tonight.

As a Yankees’ fan, this was a great, great game to watch. Pineda showed why he is the ace of this team and the offense took advantage of some sloppy Red Sox defense.

For the Red Sox, this loss may be more troubling because of Bucholz’s injury. Hopefully, he isn’t gone for long- you never want to see a player hurt.

Finally, the big news on the Yankee end is that Rob Refsnyder is getting called up tomorrow. Boston is starting two lefties the next two days, so it makes sense in the short term, but I can’t figure out the long-term plan. Refsnyder is not the savior some fans think he is, but he is too good to sit on the bench regularly. I suspect another shoe is going to drop soon.

10:39PM- Girardi told the press two interesting things in his postgame press conference. 1- Miller wasn’t going to pitch back-to-back until after the break, so that’s why they used him tonight. 2- Refsnyder is coming up and he is going to play tomorrow and Sunday.

I expect the move is Refsnyder for Figueroa, but the interesting to see will be what happens after the break. Girardi hinted that Refsnyder isn’t a temporary move.


Hello Boston

Fear not Red Sox fans. Andy may have abandoned you to live out his dream as a carney, but I am still here. And since the Yankees are coming to town this weekend, I will provide you some analysis of your season so far.

At this point you really have to look deep into your soul and wonder if this is worth it. Why do you keep following this team? This “relationship” is destroying you. Give it up, and come join the good guys.

Not convinced? Ok, I’ll analyze the Red Sox then.

The popular notion is that the rotation is sinking the team. While I can’t completely refute it, I will say it is not as bad as it looks. Every Boston starter looks significantly better when looked at though the lens of FIP and not ERA. Buchholz’s FIP is 2.56. Miley’s is 3.90. Porcello 4.46. Masterson 4.64. Significantly better than their ERA’s and a suggestion that they can show improvement in their overall numbers in the second half.

The bullpen trends the opposite way. Ogando has a 4.92. Breslow has a 5.58. The other main guys in the pen, with the exception of Uehara, have FIP’s slightly higher than their ERA’s. Still overall, the pitching should be better and if the offense can do its end, the Red Sox should be better. And in a division where the separation from worst to first is only five games, that could be significant.

That’s part of what makes this weekend so compelling. This is a chance for both teams to send a message heading into the break. Boston can show that their recent play is for real and they will be a force in the second half. The Yankees can show that they are not going to surrender first without a fight.

Back after the game.