Categories

« Isn't It Ironic? | Main | Keep The Cash »

Good For Baseball/Bad For TV?

If you are a baseball fan, the makeup of the ALCS and NLDS have to excite you. The Brewers have advanced to their first ever NLCS (Actually kids, the Brewers used to be in the AL before Uncle Bud decided "his" team needed to avoid having to pay a DH and relocated them to the AL. But, I digress) Standing in the way of their first trip to the World Series in almost 30 years are the Cardinals, the team that beat them in the 1982 Series. St. Louis managed to defeat the Phillies, the team with unbeatable pitching, with a 1-0 victory in Game 5.

Over in the AL we have the Texas Rangers, a team that made their first World Series ever last year facing off against Detroit, a team that has plenty of history, but apart from a 2006 World Series appearance (against the Cardinals) not many positive moments in the last 25 years. Yup, there are plenty of storylines, but most of the U.S. will miss them because the Yankees, Red Sox, Mets and Phillies are not involved. At least that's what the conventional wisdom wants you to believe.

The thing is, baseball's TV ratings have been plumbing new depths for awhile, even with the big cities of the East Coast heavily involved. In 1991 the fifth game of the World Series drew 37 million viewers and a 23% share of televisions on in the U.S. market. That's almost more eyeballs than the first THREE games combined of the 2010 World Series. The 5th game last year drew 14.4 million fans and an 8.8% share of TV's Meanwhile the NFL's championship games easily earn over 30 million fans and over 50% of the TV's on.

There are a lot of reasons that the NFL has surpassed baseball as "America's Sport". A HUGE part of it is gambling. Laying 5 points in a football game makes a lot more sense than having a laying 160 to win 100. (These are purely hypothetical examples) But football also has the advantage of being consumable in small doses and convenient start times. The football playoffs are a total of 11 games. MLB Just completed 19 games to finish the divisional round, that won't change. But, I believe start times play an enormous part in what has happened over the years.

The Super Bowl kicks off around 6:20pm EST, which means fans on the East Coast can watch the game and be in bed before 10:30. Contrast that with the ALDS playoffs which had the Yankees starting games mostly at 8:37 and ending them long after midnight. Some will argue that it is different in the World Series and they are right. Despite two weekend games, the earliest MLB start time is 6:07pm.

My Father grew up in England and baseball was anathema to him. He called it "bore-ball" because it never resonated with him like his version of football (soccer). I understand that the game isn't for everyone. The pace can be frustratingly slow and that isn't going to change, no matter how many rules MLB installs to speed up the game. But, the powers that be have ignored the younger generation for far too long. The last truly daytime World Series game was 1984. That means that most fans under 30 never saw a complete World Series game while they were growing up. Can you blame them for not tuning in?

The ALCS and NLCS will be interesting to watch from a ratings standpoint. Sports fans have a chance at a number of "fresh" storylines. There are always complaints that MLB Is too much Yankees, Red Sox and Phillies. Those teams are home, now will the fans at home tune in?


Comments

Peter - 1991's large ratings were definitely boosted by having the Braves and fans they acquired with TBS broadcasting their games into every nook and cranny in the country all those years. Plus the worst to first angle brought in more viewers for sure. Tough comparison. I agree with your premise in total though. The one and done makes it more "must see" for fans of both teams involved in a NFL playoff game. Compare the number of viewers for all 7 games of a baseball series, separate out the repeating viewers to get unique viewers and maybe they compare more evenly. Just thought that line of thinking up, not sure you'd agree with the logic :)

I consider myself a baseball fan. I know I will not watch complete games of the four teams remaining. I have an interest but just watching a handful of innings of the Brewers game (and my wife is from Milwaukee) was tough because I don't have the vested interest I do for the Sox or Braves.

Your gambling point is interesting. Besides the ease of understanding "the line" in football, fantasy football creates buzz around the sport that likely carries over into the playoffs because of better familiarity of the key players.

Interesting tidbit you threw in there about your father growing up in England and favoring soccer. Let's step back a moment...Peter likes the Yankees...Peter has soccer blood in him...that's two strikes in my book, just don't tell me you prefer the Stones over the Beatles...

BL

I said I liked soccer? Actually, I do, but not the stuff we show here. MLS is "AA" ball at best.

I will bet you would be surprised to know that the 1990 World Series (A's-Reds) actually had better TV numbers than the 1991 in three-of-four games. I would love to see the numbers you suggested, but I don't know how to get those.

And for the record, Beatles and I put the Beach Boys ahead of the Stones.


Hosting by Yahoo!