An Interesting Start
Sample size is an important thing because relying on too small of a sample can lead you to bad conclusions. For example, the Yankees seem to think that Chan Ho Park's pitching in the World Series last year showed he could be a very good reliever, but I would be willing to bet he won't be on the roster by July 1st.
Along those lines, the argument seems to be that AJ Burnett can't work with Jorge Posada. That conclusion was based on 16 starts last year where Burnett put up a 4.96 ERA with Posada catching. It became such an issue, that the Yankees actually benched Posada for the playoffs last year when Burnett was pitching. Yet AJ racked up a 5.27 ERA in his 5 playoff starts with Molina catching.
So please excuse me if I skip the hype surrounding tonight's start and the decision to have Posada catch AJ. Yes, the results haven't been good in the past, but I don't think that has anything to do with Posada. I think Joel Sherman captured the problem with AJ in this passage today:
Burnett presents so many issues. He essentially does everything possible to downgrade what pitching coach Dave Eiland estimates is top-three stuff among all starters in baseball.
Burnett walks too many. He does not hold runners well. He became more susceptible to the long ball last year. And 244 starts into his career, Burnett still has not mastered the ability to let go of a bad pitch or a bad at-bat, and focus wholly on the next hitter. And so he is not very good at limiting damage.
Now, some catchers might be more helpful in getting AJ to relax and pitch, but ultimately it comes down to him and him alone. That is what I am going to be interested to see tonight. Does the fact that Burnett pitched in the playoffs and won a World Series translate into a better/calmer presence n the mound? Or, will we see the typical AJ start where he is dominant for every inning except one and that one inning badly hurts him?
Tune in tonight as the Yankees try and dig out of last place.
Comments
Burnett is what he is: an inconsistent thrower, not a reliable pitcher. You never know what you're going to get out of him on any given day. Hugely talented. Not too sharp. Always a tease.
Yes, Park's World Series sample space was much too small. So was Marte's, by the way. I'll trust Marte only after a year's worth of consistent performance. And even after that, he'll have to prove himself to me all over again the following year. It will be interesting to see if he will be around on July 1st.
Posted by: Greg | April 7, 2010 12:06 PM |
Good point, Greg, but the $8 million left on Marte's deal makes me think he will definitely be a Yankee on July 1st.
Posted by: Peter
|
April 7, 2010 05:26 PM
|
Well, I thought Chan Ho was going to make it 0-2 for the year, liked that I was wrong. Still excited to see Vazquez and very happy with the fact we got to Paps. Must say, if you are a Sox fan and the order of games was in reverse, you'd feel very lucky to not be 0-3. I'm extremely confident in the roster this year. Lackey was shutting us out but he stilled threw close to 100 pitches in 6 innings.
Posted by: tim | April 7, 2010 09:40 PM |
Peter,
I realize that Marte's contract affords him a longer leash than Park. I should have written that it will be interesting to see if the Yankees want Marte around on July 1st . . .
Perhaps Sunday's performance was just a case of opening day jitters. I certainly hope so.
Posted by: Greg | April 7, 2010 10:28 PM |
Greg- Park looked great last night so maybe it will rub off on Marte? We can hope, right?
Posted by: Peter
|
April 8, 2010 01:10 PM
|