Who Are These Guys?
Saturday night's Red Sox/Rangers game featured far too many players I know nothing about. And I'm talking about Red Sox players.
First off, why is Brian Anderson on the team? Why is Fernando Cabrera on the team? Why did the Red Sox trade for Alex Gonzalez?
What is happening around here? Does this team value on base percentage? Doesn't this team follow trends? Isn't a guy with a 1.494 career whip someone to stay away from? Doesn't a guy with a career .288 OBP belong in the Independent Leagues?
I realize injuries are hitting the "ludicrous speed" level on the Red Sox roster right now, but aren't there better options? Let's talk about Brian Anderson, the player they traded Mark Kotsay for (I'm dangling prepositions baby!!!). Anderson is a very bad hitter. He has moderate power, unfortunately he couples that with nothing good. 20 home runs in 782 at bats. Did I mention he has struck out 203 times and only walked 62 times while hitting .225?
The good news with Anderson is he WILL get DFAed as soon as tomorrow when Rocco Baldelli is activated.
As for Cabrera, clearly the front office thinks they can harness this kid (does 27 years old still qualify as a kid?). Isn't that the epitome of arrogance, believing you can help a pitcher that no one else has? He walks too many but lures you into believing he can be better by striking out more than 1 per inning (189 k's in 170 IP in the majors).
Fine, perhaps the Red Sox can harness this kid's ability, but let's try doing that in the Arizona Fall League, or the Dominican Winter League, not mid-August in a playoff hunt.
Lastly, back to Gonzalez, he is a fine fielder, if you look at his career work, but he isn't good anymore. The Boston Globe's Adam Kilgore was able to look through the nonsense I heard on Sports Radio on Friday and basically spelled out why Gonzalez isn't what you think he is (coach Dennis Green, are you listening?).
Gonzalez is no longer getting to that many balls and while he does handle the ones he does get to, he isn't a "plus" shortstop anymore. In fact, Kilgore's research suggest Nick Green would be the better option, not only because he is a superior defender, but because he is hitting much better than is Gonzalez. Not to beat a dead horse, but Gonzalez is terrible at the plate. Terrible.
So Saturday night featured Jason Varitek - .754 OPS in 2009, Gonzalez - .554 OPS in 2009, and Brian Anderson .641 OPS in 2009.
That's not going to get it done. If an inning started with any of these 3, you might as well have turned the channel. This is not the bottom 3 of a playoff team. Come on! I can't say it more clearly than that. This is a terrible disappointment.
The depth on this team is scary bad right now, but also confusing. When you look at the injuries and/or surprisingly ineffective players in 2009, there have been some bad breaks, but I'm not sure why the Red Sox management has chosen to replace injured/ineffective players with the ones they have.
Things have to change.
Comments
The Sox have used 47 players this year so far, all of last year was 46 (with Sept callups).
Not sure that is a good thing.
Once the bubble of Penny/Smoltz/DiceK burst I viewed this season as something of a lost year. If they make the playoffs it will be with tremendous flaws and I have no illusions that they would win it all right now. Are they a good team capable of winning any game, yes. Are they fun to watch right now? No.
Part of it this week has also been Youkilis' suspension. With his out of the lineup it has forced different people in each game.
As for shortstop? Nice stats you dug up Andy but bottom line is when you compare one pile of crap to another does it matter whether one smells a little less bad than the other?
Posted by: blmeanie
|
August 16, 2009 08:17 AM
|
Hi Guys,
Do either of you know if the Sox and/or their food vendors do anything like this?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/16/sports/baseball/16stadium.html
Posted by: Mitchell
|
August 16, 2009 10:46 AM
|
I have no idea, have often stated that all restaurants do this - best they can.
sporting venues absolutely should be included, huge amounts of food can be distributed to needy.
Posted by: blmeanie
|
August 16, 2009 11:05 AM
|
A lot of good food could come out of Fenway into the poorer sections of the Boston area. Just curious ...
Posted by: Mitchell
|
August 16, 2009 11:24 AM
|
Yeah Mitchell, I have no idea. I do know that Fenway has gone from the old method in their luxury boxes of putting all of the night's food up-front to serving much smaller portions and replenishing upon request.
That said, I know there are still a bunch of leftovers and I would hope the Red Sox do the same thing. Given that they are partly owned by the Times, I'm sure Red Sox ownership took notice to this article.
Posted by: Andy
|
August 16, 2009 11:19 PM
|