« January 2009 | Main | March 2009 »

February 28, 2009

I'm Worried

I don't care what Jorge Posada says, but his shoulder really worries me.  It may be described as "minor soreness" and the Yankees are only being smart by shutting him down for a couple of days, but the fact remains that Posada is a huge question mark hanging over the season. 

The Yankees have done nothing to prepare in the event that Posada cannot catch this season.  Molina is the backup and his .576 OPS last season cost the Yankees a couple of wins.  That wasn't a huge deal in 2008 as that Yankee team finished six games out of a playoff spot.  But, the 2009 Yankees clearly are built to make the playoffs and with Boston and Tampa in the division, every win is vital.  

You can talk up Austin Romine and Jesus Montero all you want, but neither one of them will be showing up in the Bronx until 2011 at the earliest.  Francisco Cervelli has 73 AB's above A ball, Kevin Cash can't hit a lick. If Posada can't catch this season the Yankees are royally screwed.  Brian Cashman has about a month to find some sort of insurance and I can only hope he acts.  Leaving this position as is could destroy the entire season. 

February 21, 2009

A Character Witness?

I am trying to figure out why Joel Sherman spoke to David Segui about A-Rod and steroids.  Now Sherman is a wonderful reporter so I imagine he called a ton of people to talk about A-Rod and only Segui was willing to go on the record, but his headline "EX-MATE SEGUI: ALEX 'ROIDLESS IN SEATTLE" is laughable. 

After all, David Segui was all over the Mitchell Report, so he is hardly someone who has a lot of credibility on this issue.  Maybe some people will look at this and say that since Segui cheated he would know if A-Rod had as well, but I am not buying it.  

The problem is it is now Saturday and the stories are still being written.  A-Rod has been linked to a trainer who has a very bad reputation and his mystery cousin has been found, but won't talk.  We have also learned that "boli" was illegal without a prescription in the Dominican Republic when Alex was taking it.  I keep trying to figure out how this goes away and for the life of me I can't see it- at least until the season starts.  Once the Yankees start playing A-Rod can make this go away by repeating his April of 2007.  But that is still a long way away and the Yankees don't want this hanging over them for the next month.

They will get a break when Alex heads to the WBC and the story follows him to wherever the Dominican Team is training.  (On a side note, David Ortiz is going to have some fun times when all the reporters ask him about his stance on steroids and how it applies to his WBC teammate A-Rod.  I totally agree with what Ortiz said, I just hope he realizes what is going to happen in a week.)  But that break is only temporary and there is a bigger problem hanging over them- April 14th 2009.

That's when Selena Roberts', the person who broke the original story, book comes out.  The title is "The Many Lives of Alex Rodriguez" so you can expect that it won't be a tribute to him.  I have to hope that A-Rod was smart enough (or his PR firm was) to realize he needed to be 100% sure that the story he gave about using steroids only from 2001-2003 and never using other PED's could not be questioned, but with Alex you just don't know.  If Roberts has something new or one of the many reporters all over this story find something new, Alex is in big trouble.  We are a peculiar nation in that we seem to enjoy seeing the rich and powerful humbled and Alex certainly fits those categories.  The Germans call it schdenfreude and we have a big case of it.  With the suffering over the economy only going up, people will really enjoy seeing the richest man in baseball getting his ass handed to him.  The bullseye is on A-Rod's back, can he survive?

February 20, 2009

Another Scandal Hits The Yankees

The good news is that this one isn't their fault. 

I guess the really good news is that they are in the right clubhouse if they need to hit up a teammate for a loan. 

February 18, 2009

Halfway To A Good Idea

Rick Reilly has an interesting idea this week, give the awards won by PED users to the people that finished second in the voting.  I like the sentiment, now that we know A-Rod used steroids in 2003, why should he keep the MVP?  But the solution is flawed. 

It's easy to sit here and say this player should have won or that player should have won instead, but that assumes that the runners-up were clean too.  Does anyone want to make a substantial bet on that fact?  Sorry Mike Greenwell, but you don't deserve the 1988 MVP because Jose Canseco used steroids unless you can prove that you didn't too.  Sorry Albert Pujols, you seem clean but we just can't be sure.

Unfair you say?  Absolutely, but the players created this mess and they need to live with it.  Instead of giving the award to the runner-up in any given year, strip the award away entirely.  Let the records show through history that the 2003 MVP award was taken away from Alex Rodriguez because of PED use.  If it is ultimately proved that Clemens and Bonds used too, strip their awards away as well.  

One of my biggest worries about the steroid era is how will history put it into context?  Baseball has done nothing to address that and apart from most of these guys never making the Hall of Fame without buying a ticket, it doesn't look like they will.  Taking away the awards is a small step to fixing that. 

February 17, 2009

That Was Fun

I came away from that press conference still completely lost on this issue.  I can't rationalize how A-Rod took a drug for three years that he didn't know what it was and wasn't sure if it worked or not.  The whole "I was young and stupid" line doesn't work for me at all either.

But, I am also really sick of this whole thing and if Alex steps up and tries to speak out against steroid use and supports the Tyler Hooten Foundation then I will move on too.  Alex asked to be judged from this point forward and the ball is in his court on that.  If he goes from here and becomes an example, I have a feeling people will forgive him. 

Why Is It Just Baseball?

As we await the A-Rod circus today I want to know how come all the other sports get a pass on PED's?  Granted, nobody of A-Rod's stature has been caught using these things, but as this story shows, the NFL isn't clean in all of this. 

I guess it really is the level of the users.  Baseball has some of its biggest home run hitters getting busted while the NFL has mostly defensive players like Larry Izzo.  I am not saying I want to open the paper tomorrow and read that Peyton Manning bought PED's, but I would like some balance from the media.  I would guess that this problem also extends to basketball, hockey, tennis, golf, etc., why wouldn't it?  But, for now baseball is going to take the beating for all of it.  End of rant and I will be back after today's festivities with a reaction.   

February 15, 2009

How About This Move?

The Mariners DFA'ed Tug Hulett today.  Nothing remarkable about him, but the Yankees should get him into camp and give him a look. 

Hulett is a left-handed infielder who has a career OBP of .394 in almost 2,000 AB's in the minors.  He is about to turn 26 and had 49 lousy AB's in the majors last season where he hit .224/.309/.306.  Still he played second, short and third and that OBP is worth a look. (He also put up a nice .380 OBP in AAA last season.)  At the very least, I think he offers a more upside than Angel Berroa.  

Winter Review

Let's do a quick review of what the Yankees accomplished this offseason....

The Good: Snagging the best starting pitcher and Mark Teixeira was a major coup.  Both are still young and should greatly improve the club.  In Sabathia the Yankees have the ace they have lacked for years.  Beyond that, the guy is an absolute gamer, demanding the ball on three-days rest in Milwaukee, even though an injury would have killed his free agent chances.  Teixeira is a great bat and glove and he should really improve the defense and offense.  

Exchanging Betemit for Swisher is another savy move as Betemit wasn't doing much and Swisher should get a a chance to contribute on a regular basis (assuming he isn't traded.)

The Bad: It's hard to harp on it, but the bench is still a major concern.  If Swisher and Nady are both kept, it is much better, but the backup catching and infielder situations are poor at best.  Why does Cashman never focus on a bench?

The Unknown: Which A.J. Burnett is coming to New York?  The guy who struck out 231 hitters in the AL last year or the guy who was hurt most of his career?  It is impossible to say, but the Yankees had better hope the former after spending over $80 million on him.  

Strengths: The Yankees have a number.  From a very good rotation to a strong lineup, there are plenty of reasons to like this team.  And with Hughes and Kennedy slotted for AAA and a number of power relief arms joining them there, the Yankees should be able to survive pitching injuries

Weaknesses: They have no depth behind the position players beyond the loser of the Swisher/Nady competition.  An injury to a player like Jeter, or a slow return by Posada would be a serious blow.

What's Next? Clearly the expectations are a return to the playoffs and more.  If the team struggles early, expect Joe Girardi to get the axe quickly and a new manager brought in.  Anything less than a playoff spot will be a huge failure for this team.

February 14, 2009

Here Comes The Sun

It's here!  Our long wait is over, we have baseball back again and not a moment too soon.  Pitchers and catchers are down in Tampa and starting their first workouts.  For the Yankees there are a number of things to watch, but the biggest thing on my mind is a number- 110.

That's the maximum number of games that Joe Girardi says Jorge Posada will catch this year for the Yankees.  (This of course assumes that Posada's shoulder is healthy.) That means we have at least 52 games of Jose Molina to look forward to and over 200 AB's. 

That is simply too much Molina and it is going to cost the Yankees.  I have said it before, but now that we know Girardi's plans it becomes even more vital, the Yankees have to get a better backup.  Brian Cashman is making a huge mistake here by leaving this position so vulnerable.

In other news, Bobby Abreu signed for $5 miilion with the Angels, a good deal for them.  And there are still quite a few free agents out there.  Sooner or later these guys are going to go somewhere, the only question is when.  I hope the Yankees are keeping their eyes on them, because there is a lot of talent on those lists. 

Anyway, enjoy the first day of spring! 

Get It Right

And we reach our final category....

 

Hank Aaron .305/.374/.555 755 career HR's OPS+ 155

Babe Ruth .342/.474/.690 714 career HR's OPS+ 207

Frank Robinson .294/.389/.537 586 career HR's OPS+ 154

Mel Ott .304/.414/.533 511 career HR's OPS+ 155

I should also mention that Sammy Sosa played right.... 

February 13, 2009

Center Stage

For your consideration....

Willie Mays .302/.384/.557 660 career HR's OPS+ 156

Mickey Mantle .298/.421/.557 536 career HR's OPS+ 172

Joe DiMaggio .325/.398/.579 361 career HR's OPS+ 155

Tris Speaker .345/.428/.500 117 career HR's OPS+ 158

Ty Cobb .366/.433/.512 117 career HR's OPS+ 167 

Ken Griffey, Jr. .288/.373/.547 611 career HR's OPS+ 138 

February 12, 2009

Out In Left

For Your Consideration....

 

Rickey Henderson  .279/.401/.419 297 career HR's OPS+127

Ted Williams .344/.482/.634 521 career HR's OPS+ 191

Stan Musial .331/.417/.559 475 career HR's OPS+ 159

I think that's enough, but I would be remiss if I didn't mention...

Barry Bonds .298/.444/.607 762* career HR's  OPS+ 182

February 11, 2009

Don't Get Caught Short

For your consideration....

 

Honus Wagner .327/.391/.466 101 career HR's OPS+ 150

Cal Ripken .276/.340/.447 431 career HR's OPS+ 112

Arky Vaugn .318/.406/.453 96 career HR's OPS+ 136

Luke Appling .310/.399/.398 45 career HR's OPS+112

Joe Cronin .301/.390/.468 170 career HR's OPS+119 

February 10, 2009

Priceless

Want a good laugh in the midst of all the A-Rod stuff?  Check out Letterman's Top-10 from last night.

I am not sure which is my favorite because #10, #8, #6, #4 and #1 are brilliant.   

Third Choices

For your consideration....

Mike Schmidt .267/.380/.527 548 career HR's OPS+ 147

George Brett  .305/.369/.487 317 career HR's OPS+ 135

Eddie Matthews .271/.376/.509 512 career HR's OPS+ 143

Chipper Jones .310/.408/.548 408 career HR's  OPS+ 145

Wade Boggs .328/.415/.443 118 career HR's OPS+ 130 

February 09, 2009

Random A-Rod Thoughts

I caught almost all of the A-Rod interview and alternated between amazement and empathy.

I would start with the empathy.  There was something incredibly sad about this interview.  It was like you could see A-Rod realizes what this means for his future and would do anything in the world to change it, but he also knows he can't.  

I found the section where he accused Selena Roberts of breaking into his house fascinating.  He claims to have a police report and if he does then she should be fired from Sports Illustrated.  Now, if he doesn't have a police report, what the hell is he thinking because that will only make him look worse?

I wish Alex didn't say things like the stuff he said about Washington Heights.  A-Rod talked about he was born in Washington Heights and would really like to get involved with the kids there.  When I hear that I wonder, why haven't you before this?  A-Rod could probably throw a baseball from Yankee Stadium to Washington Heights and he has spent five years in the Bronx.  If he wanted to help those kids, he could have long before this, don't pretend to care now to make your image look better.

I find the whole concept of forgiveness odd.  Does A-Rod owe us as fans an apology?  I don't think so, I think it goes beyond a singular player to the entire sport.  The owners and the players defrauded us for years.  If anyone is going to apologize, I would like to hear it from Selig and Fehr. 

That being said, I find it very hard to reconcile A-Rod's statements today with his Katie Couric interview from December 2007.  That was conducted after the Mitchell Report dropped and included A-Rod denying ever using any PED's.  Why did he agree to that interview in the first place if he was going to lie?  To me, the only answer is that he did it because he assumed he would get away with the lie.   

How do you handle his admission of steroid use in years other than 2003?  On one hand, he didn't have to do that because he is only accused of failing a test in 2003.  On the other hand, by saying he did it while at Texas he is almost like a doctor taking a diseased limb off a patient.  It's basically, look at my record from 1995-2000 and then 2004-present and I am clean.  Throw the other stuff out, 158 home runs, etc., and A-Rod is betting he has enough to be a Hall of Famer someday. It's a pretty smart approach because it gives voters some wiggle rooom.  If A-Rod hits 800 home runs and voters believe his story they can say I am voting for a guy who hit over 600 home runs while clean. 

Along those lines, A-Rod needs to do a little more prep.  It's probably not the best idea to hold up being 20-years old and finishing 2nd to Juan Gonzalez in the MVP race as evidence that you were clean.  

Why did Gammons start asking questions about Torre's book when he didn't follow up on half the steroids questions? And A-Rod handled those brilliantly. 

You know the only thing I think someone like A-Rod could do here is say to the interviewer, "Take a blood sample right here.  I will pee in a cup right here.  Test it for whatever you want, save the samples and keep testing them over the years as the science gets better.  You will not find anything illegal in my samples."  That is about the only way you could ever give him the benefit of the doubt.  And that's the problem with all of this.  Is there anything you can see right now that you can honestly say is naturally done on a baseball diamond?  I think that is where Curt Schilling is dead right, there are 103 names out there.  There is HGH and other crap out there, until we know that those are being tested how do we know the game is clean? 

And this is a baseball-wide problem.  100 years from now someone is going to open the record books and wonder why all these guys near the top of these lists are also not in the Hall of Fame.  Somebody in the game needs to think about that and come up with an answer.  Maybe we create a wing of the Hall of Fame for players from say 1988 and on?  I don't have any great ideas, but I know that baseball is damaging its history by ignoring the problem.  

And finally, where is Gene Orza right now?  The allegation that he was tipping off players about steroids tests now moves front and center.  A-Rod said his peace, you can choose to believe him or not believe him, but Orza is next and he needs to speak up. 

The True Test

Now that ARod has admitted using steroids during a 3-year period covering 2001 to 2003, the real test is at hand.  Will baseball fans lend him the same generosity they have offered to other baseball players who have admitted using performance enhancing drugs (PEDs)?

When you consider the case of Andy Pettitte and how he has received far less negative press than those who have initially denied taking PEDs, were exposed and continue to deny taking PEDs like Rafael Palmeiro, Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens.

Perhaps we can argue that ARod's situation is different because he initially denied ever using PEDs prior to any smoking gun.  But now that there are 4 unnamed sources indicating a positive test in 2003, he is coming clean.  With Pettitte, I don't recall even a trace of a rumor about him being a user.

No matter what, ARod's life just got a bit tougher.

The biggest news to me now is that out of the 104 players who tested positive for PEDs in 2003, we now know one name.  I like Curt Schillings suggestion of publishing the other 103 names.  But with that comes the almost certainty that many Red Sox players will be implicated including ones that were potentially a significant part of the 2004 season.

But we are beyond that now.  Everyone is a suspect and the steroid-era has proven that most, if not all of what we witnessed over the past 20 years was artificially inflated.

Consider this, of the names in the top-10 career Home Runs, you have:  #1 Bonds, #6 Sosa, #8 McGwire, #10 Palmeiro (and ARod #12).

For single season HR leaders, spots 1-6 are occupied by Bonds, McGwire and Sosa.

It is time to face it, the game we have enjoyed was kind of like professional wrestling.  Enjoyable (to some) yet, not the real thing (at least they admit it)

My fear is that baseball is still loaded with PEDs.  Perhaps not steroids, but human growth hormone and other drugs I know nothing about.  How can we know?  And how should we feel about the game of baseball if we have no assurances that we are watching something at least close to the real thing?

I've been thinking about this a bunch since testing was introduced back in 2005.  I still very much enjoy baseball and for that I'm thankful, but that's not to say I watch it with the same approach.  Now I'm far more skeptical and less likely to believe what I'm being told.  For every mammoth home run I see hit, I can't help but wonder how it went as far as it did.

Second To None

For your consideration at second....

 

Joe Morgan .271/.392/.427  268 career HR's OPS+ 132 (We are not factoring in his broadcast career which would obviously disqulaify him)

Ryne Sandberg .285/.344/.452 282 career HR's OPS+ 114

Rogers Hornsby .358/.434/.577 301 career HR's OPS+ 175

Nap Lajoie .338/.380/.467 83 career HR's OPS+ 150

Jackie Robinson .311/.409/.474 137 career HR's OPS+ 132

Roberto Alomar .300/.371/.443 210 career HR's OPS+ 116 

February 08, 2009

Fascinating

Great piece today by Jon Heyman about how the union and specifically, Gene Orza, screwed up with this steroids issue.  If Orza had just accepted the results of the 2003 testing and not tried to fight them, the evidence would have been destroyed and we never would have learned about A-Rod's test.  But, while Orza was fighting, the evidence was subpoenaed by the BALCO investigators and now the feds have it. 

And there are two very good points in the article.

1- Orza tipped A-Rod off about a test in 2004.  That will have huge ramifications if proven true.

2- There are 103 other names on that list and you have to expect those will start to come out soon.   

On To First

How About....

 
Lou Gehrig .340/.447/.632 493 Career HR's 179 OPS+

Jimmie Foxx .325/.428/.609 534 Career HR's 163 OPS+ 

Harmon Killebrew .256/.376/.509 573 Career HR's 143 OPS+ (Played more games at first than any other position which brings me to...)

Ernie Banks .274/.330/.500 512 Career HR's 122 OPS+ 

Willie McCovey .270/.374/.515 521 Career HR's 147 OPS+

Some other notes: Mark McGwire 583 HR's, Rafael Palmeiro 569 HR's also played first, let's leave it at that. 

February 07, 2009

Sigh

You may not have noticed, but I haven't had anything to say about the Torre book in a couple of days.  The reason for that is because the A-Rod chapter really bothered me.  It bothered me so much that I put the book down for a day and then went and read it again last night.  I wanted to take my time with my thoughts. 

What I was going to say about it seems almost silly in light of today's A-Rod news, but here it goes.  It is clear that Torre and Verducci don't like A-Rod very much.  In the book they blame him for just about everything except cancer.  Is it true the Yankees have sucked in the postseason since A-Rod arrived?  Yes, it is.  Is it true A-Rod has sucked in the postseason since he arrived?  Yes, it is.  But, I think you need to dig a little deeper than that.  Start with the pitching.  Since 2003, the Yankees have had mediocre pitching.  Look back at the teams that won and they all had deep pitching staffs.  Do you think not having that pitching matters in the playoffs?  I would say absoultely.  

Anyway, I was going to go on like that for awhile, but luckily I have a new topic to vent on.  Apparently, A-Rod failed a steroids test in 2003.  (BTW- if anyone is reading the book and doesn't think it goes out of its way to bash Alex, please speak up)  Here are a bunch of thoughts on this in no particular order.

1- This is a six-year old test that is just coming to light now?  And, there are 103 other players who also failed.  When are those names going to start leaking out?  This would be a wonderful time for baseball and the players' union to come clean and provide all the names.  It will never happen, but it would be a nice thing right now.

2- I have no doubt the story is true.  Four sources confirmed it and that seems more than enough to me.  But, I also have a major problem with "unnamed sources" hiding in the shadows and destroying people.  

3- Who knew about this list and more specifically, did the Yankees know about it?  If so, why did they trade for A-Rod in the first place?  It would seem to me that the only reason the Yankees would have traded for A-Rod if they had known about this was because they knew everyone was juicing.

4- How scary is it that the most credible person in regards to this topic is Jose Canseco?

5- I was really looking forward to seeing A-Rod break the home run record as a "clean" player.  That's pretty much gone now.

6- However, A-Rod was tested the past few years and for the WBC, which has Olympic-level testing and he didn't fail once.  How do we reconcile that with this?

7- This just proves what a bad job the Mitchell Report did.  This garbage is everywhere and I am sick of hearing Bud Selig crow about how good a job baseball has done to curb steroid use.  Bud, you and the other owners and players were running an athletic pharmacy for years.  Cut the crap and admit it.

8- Alex absolutely needs to get in front of a camera in the next 24 hours and address this.  Admit it or deny it (be careful if you deny it Alex, think of Clemens) but he has to address it.

9- Along the lines of #3, do the Yankees have a way to get out of his deal now?  Maybe not his contract, but the whole "milestone home run" thing?  It would seem to me that marketing home runs clouded by steroids is a losing proposition.

10- I am depressed now. 

Behind The Dish

The following catchers are presented for your consideration.  As always, feel free to add someone to your list.

Johnny Bench .267/.342/.476 389 HR's career OPS+ 126

Yogi Berra .285/.348/.482 358 HR's career OPS+ 125 

Carlton Fisk .269/.341/.457 376 HR's career OPS+ 117

Bill Dickey .313/.382/.486 202 HR's career OPS+ 127

Mike Piazza .308/.377/.545 427 HR's career OPS+ 142

Josh Gibson It's impossible to come up with historical stats for Gibson, but he was known as "The Black Babe Ruth" and is in the Hall of Fame.  His plaque there says he hit almost 800 home runs.  

 

 

February 06, 2009

It's Funny...

but Joel Sherman summed up my concerns about Derek Jeter perfectly.  Sherman also includes a very sobering fact, no team has ever won the World Series with a 37-year old shortstop. 

The problem as I said yesterday is going to be that Jeter should be right at the doorstep of 3,000 hits.  Assuiming Jeter gets 180 hits a year for the next two seasons (he has averaged 200 a season the last three years) he will have 2,895 hits. Now, it would be reasonable to assume if he gets to that point that he would get his 3,000 hit in 2011, but I don't think Jeter is going to take a one-year deal and the paycut the Yankees will want to give him. 

Sherman calls it "D-Day" and it is a good term for it.  I don't think Jeter would ever complain in the press or even rip the Yankees if a deal isn't reached, but he wouldn't have to.  Fans will do that for him and fans will demand that Jeter comes back.  A-Rod will get sucked into this because the majority of talk radio airwaves will be filled with something along the lines of, "How can you give that bum who has never won a ten-year deal and then not show Jeter, a true Yankee, any respect?" 

And the biggest problem is there is no good solution.  The smart move from a baseball perspective will be to give Jeter the keys to Yankee Stadium and a position in the front office for him to retire to, but Jeter isn't going to accept that.  The right move from an emotional standpoint would be to sign him to a new deal and let him keep playing short.  The middle ground is probably a two-year deal and a position change, but where could you put him?  First is gone, second is too hard defensively, center is being left open for Austin Jackson and his bat doesn't support a move to left or right.  I suppose you could move A-Rod to left and Jeter to third, but do you really want to go into a season with two of your starters learning new positions?

Add in the fact that there are no viable candidates in the farm system to replace Jeter and this becomes even more depressing.  At some point, someone is going to be asked to fill Derek Jeter's shoes.  It could be a free agent, it could be a rookie, but the pressure is going to be tremedous.  Mickey Mantle couldn't handle it initially when he was brought to the majors as the next DiMaggio and given the #6.  

As Sherman says, 324 regular season games to go.   

Let The Countdown Begin!!

We have talked back and forth in the comments section about the greatest at any particular postion, so for the next nine days we will debate them in posts with the final day coinciding with the first day pitchers and catchers can report. 

Now, let's talk rules.  For those of you who keep score at games, the progression will make sense, we start with pitchers and end with right fielders.  You can nominate anyone who has played a single game at that position and you are under no obligation to make an argument for your selection.  I will throw out some names and stats to get the topic started each night. (And for pitchers feel free to select more than 1)

So, without further ado let's talk pitchers.  Some names to consider....

Cy Young 511 wins, 2803 K's 138 ERA+

Walter Johnson 417 Wins, 3509 K's 147 ERA+

Sandy Koufax 165 Wins, 2396 K's, 131 ERA+

Lefty Grove 300 Wins, 2266 K's, 148 ERA+

Christy Mathewson 373 Wins, 2502 K's, 135 ERA+

Pedro Martinez 214 Wins, 3117 K's, 154 ERA+

Mariano Rivera 68 Wins, 934 K's, 199 ERA+ (Mariano has the best ERA+ of anyone with 1,000 IP in MLB history.  For comparison sake, Pedro is #2)   

And your choices are?   

 

February 05, 2009

A Couple Of Tidbits

Interesting note here in Jon Heyman's latest, the Yankees tried to get Andruw Jones to agree to a minor league deal. 

I am curious as to why Jones turned them down because it doesn't seem like the Braves are going to sign him and the Yankees obviously have a need in center.   He is getting paid millions by the Dodgers already so I don't see any situation where he would logically expect to get more than the major league minimum from any team. If he had taken the deal and won the job he would have been in a potent lineup with plenty of RBI chances to boost his value for his next free agent deal in 2010.  Strange that he didn't take it, but I guess he is looking for a major league deal. 

In other news, Derek Jeter will face the Yankees as a member of Team USA in an exhibition game this March.  This will be weird to say the least, but perhaps the Yankees can use the site of Jeter in another uniform to start getting their minds thinking about 2011.  Jeter will be almost 37 and a free agent.  He will probably have somewhere around 2900 hits, so the pressure to bring him back as a Yankee will be even greater than it normally would have been.  But, the Yankees have to be smart, they can't give him a long term deal and they will need to talk to him about a position change for the 2011 season.  It could all get very ugly. 

February 04, 2009

Now I Get It

Mark Kotsay is expected to be sidelined until May according to the Boston Globe.  That explains the Brad Wilkerson deal the other day.

Wilkerson can do everything Kotsay can do...in theory.

Interesting

I haven't gotten to this part in the book, but I find this take from Tyler Kepner fascinating.  If you follow Kepner, you know he has great sources and does a great job reporting.  I don't know what it means in 2009, but I think it is fair to say that Alex was not exactly embraced in the 2004 Yankees' clubhouse. 

A Minor Deal

I was going to write a big thing about how the Yankees need to make more trades like the minor league one they did today, but Steve Goldman did it better than I ever could

I am not as down on Austin Jackson as Goldman is, but I do worry about how soon he will be ready.  In addition, where are the impact bats after Jackson?  Certainly not at AAA and it's hard to get too excited about prospects who haven't even cracked AA.  

What the Yankees have is a ton of pitching prospects and like Goldman says, they need to turn some of those into position players.  What he didn't mention and what makes this more important in my mind is when you look at the rotation for the next three+ years there are really no empty spots.  Sabathia and Burnett are obviously going to be in it.  Wang will be a free agent after 2011.  Joba and Hughes are under Yankee control until after 2012 at least.  And there are players like Aceves and Kennedy who could always fill in as needed. 

Now of course injuries happen and players don't perform as expected, but stockpiling pitchers while neglecting hitters is going to cause problems.  In an ideal world the Yankees would groom some young position players who can then start to fill in the gaps in the lineup.  The Yankees can of course just throw money at the problem, but it is far safer and more efficent to have some alternatives in the minors.  Maybe Cashman will address that in the near future, but if history is any guide, he won't. 

250 Pages In

I have some more quibbles with this book, though I will say up front that it is very well written and entertaining. 

First, more spelling mistakes and historical errors.  For example, there is a comment about the 2003 ALCS and how "In Boston where more people were watching than saw the Patriots win the Super Bowl eight months earlier..." The only problem is the Patriots did not win the Super Bowl in 2003, they won in 2002 (and 2004 and 2005) so that should have read 20 months earlier.  

But more troubling to me is the lack of proper balance in the critque of certain moves.  For example, there is a long part in the book about how Torre did not want to sign Giambi and instead would have preferred to keep Tino for a year and then turn the job over to Nick Johnson.  The book then details how Giambi ran into injury problems and other difficulties later on with the Yankees.  Meanwhile, the reader is left to assume that Nick Johnson would have been a perfect solution and Torre was absolutely right.  I loved Nick Johnson with the Yankees, but Nick Johnson can't stay healthy.  He played in 38 games the last two years while Giambi played in almost 230.  I think that might be relevant information when sizing up the two players.

In addition, the book continually lauds the core group of the dynatsy (Jeter, O'Neil, Bernie, Posada, Tino, Brosius) as "special" players, but then blames the Yankees for never adequately replacing them.  Isn't that the point of a special player?  I don't know who will close games for the Yankees in 2012, but I am 99.9% sure that it will not be a player as good as Rivera.  Those guys were tremendously special, they always seemed to be at their best when it mattered the most and I don't see how you can fault the Yankees for not finding their equals.  That's what makes them special!

Finally, there are passages like this one which drive me nuts:

"Quite simply, Enrique Wilson was one of the worst hitters to ever play for the New York Yankees.  He appeared in 264 games for the Yankees and batted.216.  Only four men in the history of the franchise ever hit worse with that much time in pinstropes....Morever, Wilson was neither especially fleet nor adept in the field."

I don't think a Yankee fan would dispute any of those assertions about Enrique Wilson.  But who exactly was the one filling out the lineup with Wilson's name in it?  This is where the use of a third person narrative really causes problems.  Tom Verducci has correctly identified that Enrique Wilson was a bad player, but he hasn't asked his co-author why he kept putting Wilson into the lineup.  I would love to hear something from Torre about what Wilson did to earn all that playing time.    

Anyway, it's a very good book so far and Torre hasn't said anything I would take him to task for.  Then again, I am only in 2003, history is going to get a little more choppy from here on out. 

Three Chapters In

Well I got through three chapters of "The Yankee Years" today and I have found nothing shokcing or surprising.  I do have two complaints/critiques. 

The first is from page 2, where one of the reasons given as to why George Steinbrenner parted ways with  Buck Showalter is for "blowing a two games to one lead" in the ALDS.  As most fans remember, the Yankees actually blew a two games to none lead in that series.  I guess that also means they blew a two games to one lead as the book says, but I don't think that was the author's point.  I am surprised that mistake was made.  (On a side note, that series loss was far and away the most painful loss I have ever suffered as a fan.  2004 was bad, but this was much worse, especially after they led in Games 3, 4 and 5 and lost all three.)

The second thing that bugs me is the steroids issue.  The Mitchell Report made it clear that the 2000 Yankees had a number of players who juiced.  There are details of a conversation between Torre and Pettitte from December 2007 when Pettitte was about to admit to part of his HGH use.  Torre basically gives him a pass, telling him "You weren't trying to get back to win a game for yourself."

Now, I can't hold Torre to a standrad that didn't exist back then, nobody did much of anything to stop steroids.  (With the notable excpetion of Rick Helling who is identified in the book as having stood up at meetings of the MLBPA in 1998 and every year after that asking what the Union would do about streoids.) But, I find Torre's pardoning of Pettitte interesting.  Pettitte is clearly one of Torre's guys and one theme that you can see very clearly in the beginning of this book is that Torre is going to back up his guys to the hilt.  That's great and loyatly is a good thing, but I wonder what happened to the rest of the Yankees who weren't Torre's guys and were in the Mitchell Report.  Did David Justice get a call from Joe Torre?  Why isn't this explored more in the book?   It's an interesting topic that I wish had more teeth to it.

More later 

February 03, 2009

Minor Key

The Red Sox signed Brad Wilkerson to a minor league deal yesterday.  Wilkerson is a very poor man's version of Adam Dunn.  Let me qualify that a bit more.  He walks a fair amount and hits for a low average.  He has shown power but since 2007, that power has all but disappeared.  He has really struggled the past two seasons and I see this signing strictly as a depth deal.

Wilkerson can play all 3 outfield spots and first base.

Ideally, he goes to Pawtucket and finds some at bats there and tries to regain his old form.  His old form wasn't anything to get too excited about, but he could get on base and slug a bit.  Wilkerson is a call-up option if Mark Kotsay gets hurt and if the Red Sox feel they need a veteran in place of a Jeff Bailey or Chris Carter.

In other news, old friend/fiend Manny Ramirez turned down a 1-year, $25mm offer from the Dodgers yesterday.  I don't know about you, but given the state of the economy and the state of Manny's reputation, I'd have accepted that deal.  It would have allowed him to play for a new long-term deal next year and would've allowed him to show the baseball world he isn't as big a distraction as people think.

I just cannot see him landing a multi-year deal given the glut of free agents on the market.  So sad for Manny.

February 02, 2009

Book Club

According to the nice people at Amazon.com, I should have a copy of "The Yankee Years" in my hands sometime tomorrow.  I plan to start posting on it shortly after that.  I will probably break it up into multiple posts over the balance of this week. If any of you are reading it, feel free to share your thoughts as well here or shoot me an email (peter@yankeesredsox.com)

February 01, 2009

Bargain Shopping

Well we are now less than two weeks to pitchers and catchers and there are almost 100 guys who are still free agents.  At what point do the Yankees get back into the free agent market, if only to improve the bench?  I am not recommending they sign Manny Ramirez, but at this point I think there are some names out there they could sign for very low money and possibly for non-guaranteed money.   

I know Pudge was a disaster with the bat during his two months in Yankees' uniform last season, but the Yankees still don't know if Posada will be able to catch all season.  Rodriguez didn't show it while he was here, but he still has more offensive upside than Molina, while providing similar defense.  If Posada can't catch, the Yankees need all the options they can get.  How about signing Pudge to an incentive-based deal and seeing what happens in camp?

The other main area I have of concern is with the majority of the infield.  What happens if A-Rod, Cano or Jeter gets hurt and has to miss time?  I don't like the choice of Berroa or Ransom to fill in, so how about some different names?  Start with Ray Durham who rebounded from a terrible 2007 and hit pretty well in 2008.  Therer are two obvious downsides with Durham, his age and the fact that he has only really played second in his career.  But, he can still play second well and that might translate to other positions on the infield.  He is a switch-hitter and had a .380 OBP last season (.352 for his career).  

A different idea would be to sign Nomar.  (On a side note, Imagine going in a time machine back to 1999 and telling people that of the three great shortstops at that time (A-Rod, Jeter and Nomar) only one would still be with his original team and still a shortstop.  You would be laughed out of the room.)  Nomar gets hurt way too much, but when he is healthy he can still hit (.264/.326/.466).  More importantly, he played short again in 2008 and also third and first.  Nomar is still searching for a job and searching for a World Series ring, would he come to New York to try and get both on a minor league deal? 

There are so many good outfielders out there, but the Yankees don't have room for any right now.  With Nady and Swisher still on the roster and Melky out of options, there is no point in discussing them.  If they manage to trade someone in the next few weeks, they could look to this market too.