Categories

« No-Hitter Redux | Main | The Shift Begins »

The Blame Game

Some will credit Joe Girardi for standing up after Sunday night's disaster and taking the blame for the Yankees' performance.  For me, it was more an act of stupid heroism.  I think trying to assign blame now is a pointless exercise and it won't make the Yankees hit any better, but maybe it will motivate the team.  We have seen countless examples in sports of teams rallying around their coach and maybe this was Girardi's attempt to instill that.  If it works, he will look like a genuis, but it got me to thinking about where the real blame for this season's stumble (and that's what I am calling it for now) lies.

When I thought about it for awhile, it came down to three different entities.  I say entities because I cannot speicifically name two groups.  Anyway, here are my three and please feel free to share your thoughts in the comments section.

#1 is the Yankees' doctors/trainers.  Last year it was Marty Miller who walked the plank for all the injuries in April and May because of his "new-age" techniques.  You could argue that this season is simply bad luck, but how about the way the team has handled some of their injured players.  How did A-Rod and Posada get back into games long before they were medically cleared to do so?  If I am going to lay some blame, I am going to start here.

#2 is Dave Eiland.  Eiland replaced Ron Guidry, a guy who won 168 more games as a Yankee than him, becasue he was supposed to be the key to handling the young pitchers.  Kennedy and Hughes have been disasters and I don't know if you noticed, but Joba isn't blowing people away the same way he did last year.  Do we give Eiland credit for Edwar Ramirez?  Maybe, but I would like to see more than 8+ innings from him before I call him a success.

#3 is the bench as a unit.  Losing A-Rod and Posada would have been bad under any conditions, but the utter lack of performance from Ensberg, Molina, Gonzalez, Moeller, Duncan and Betemit has made them killer injuries.  There have been two large holes in the lineup for the past three weeks and nobody from this group has stepped up to fill them. 

Those would be my choices for the three biggest cuplrits in the season.  I thought of some others but I felt these were the biggest.  

But, as I said, I think the blame game is stupid.  Look at things right now, 20-24 exactly where they were in 2007.  The difference is the 2007 team had scored 57 more runs at this point but was also 4 1/2 games further out of first.  I will take that trade, because the games are more significant to me.  A-Rod is back tonight and stop and take a look at the schedule from now until the end of June.  If the Yankees are who we think they are, they will make a big run over these next six weeks.   

UPDATE: Well, that sucks a lot of hope out of the air, the Orioles score a touchdown in the first.


Comments

Peter,

I'm having a hard time sharing your optimism. Here's why:

1. With the exception of Hughes/Kennedy/Chamberlain, this is mostly last year's team -- except they're one year older. And they weren't exactly spring chickens last year.

2. They're not hitting. It's easy to attribute this to the A-Rod/Posada injuries. But it's so much more than that. Cano is not hitting at all. I'd hate to think he needs Bowa babysitting him, to keep him focused. We need him to step up. Now. I do think he'll hit better, though. Damon and Giambi are . . . nothing right now. I keep reading and hearing quotes like this: "Jason's hitting it hard -- it's just that he's hitting it at someone". It's a quarter of a season already. That doesn't wash anymore. Hit it where they ain't, Jason. Or Joe's gonna have to sit you. 'Cause you ain't on the field for your stellar defense. Matsui has cooled off a bit and Abreu quite a bit. Duncan is . . . where, exactly? Certainly not starting against Oliver Perez. He's a lefty. If Duncan isn't starting against Perez, why have him on the team at all? What worries me the most, oddly enough, is that it's not just the Yankees who aren't hitting. There's something peculiar going on in the AL, nobody is really quite sure what, but whatever it is, it looks very widespread. I find it hard to believe that its going to change this year. If that's the case, then maybe the Yankees don't hit well enough to overcome their starting pitching deficiencies. That was the strategy (stragedy?) after all -- to out-mash their opponents. Hasn't quite worked out that way, has it?

3. The pressure on Hughes and Kennedy was (is) probably more than any of us can imagine. The Yanks have asked a lot of these kids. Maybe too much. Mussina's 5-inning tight-rope walk always leaves me holding my breath. Sorry, but I'm not going to believe he's going to give us quality for the entire season until he's actually done it. And even then, I'm sure I'll be wondering how on earth he did it. I've been asking myself one word about the Hawkins signing since it happened: Why? If the Yanks want to throw away a few million every year, why can't they ever throw some of it my way? I sure could use it. Farnsworth? I really started believing that maybe -- just maybe -- he'd turned a corner under Girardi. New manager whom he knows, a chance to start over, etc. Then he spits the bit against the Mets. Stupid me. How could I have been so delusional? I think Wang will be great, and Pettite will probably be fine. But man, these two have got to stop giving up the big inning, especially Andy.

4. History. Yeah, it's nice to take solace in recent history, and think that since they've done it before, they can do it again. But there's another historical perspective: over 100 years of hard data that says that what they did in 2005, and again in 2007, was an aberration. That's a much bigger sample space. And although I haven't analyzed it in detail, they're probably the only team in history to have come back from the depths twice in three years. I'm not feeling too good about the odds of making it 3 years out of 4.

The good news (great news, all things considered) is that they're not that far back. But we need a lot of guys to start hitting, quickly. And we need Moose to keep fooling 'em. And we need Andy to get back on track. And we need a whole lot more out of the 4th and 5th spots in the rotation.

Maybe we should make a sacrificial offering to the baseball gods. We could sacrifice Pavano and Igawa. I think we can somehow manage without them . . .

How about Abreu's defense in RF? I honestly believe if he wasn't awful, Kennedy would never have been sent down. I think Greg is probably right but like you said, we'll know more by the end of August. We've got too many DH's [Matsui, Giambi, Abreu, Damon] and too many weak fielders [Posada, Jeter] to compete if we aren't going to hit.

Reminds me of that great passage in Jim Bouton's book when he was asked by a reporer what was wrong with the 1966 Yankees: "Maybe we just stink."

I bought the hype that Hughes, Kennedy, and Chamberlain were enough to solidify the Yankees pitching. Looks like (with the exception of Joba) that Boston has done a far better job of developing their young pitchers.

In a normal year, the Yankees' hitting would overcome some of the inconsistency and turmoil in their pitching. But boy, this team can't hit.

A combination of age, slumps, and injury has produced an order that by and large does not hit. The strength of the Yankees has been the Murders-Row-and-then-Cano lineup that is strong in all 9 spots. Those days are gone.

Not ready to stick a fork in it just yet because nobody is running away with it in the AL the way Arizona is in the NL. Everyone else in the AL has flaws too.

They have another month to get their act together.

****How about Abreu's defense in RF? I honestly believe if he wasn't awful, Kennedy would never have been sent down.****

Bobby is terrified of the wall and he always has been. He's also terrified of getting his uniform dirty so to save the team money on laundry he often will refuse to dive for a ball. I remember long years of watching him on the Phillies where he could easily make it an entire game without a speck of dirt on his uniform. I remember several times where I mentioned this to him politely from my seats in RF at the Vet. He is less than the sum of his statistics and he always has been.

~embittered Phillies fan~

Okay, Rasner is one cause for optimism. The two super-hyped kids (starters) have ERAs hovering dangerously close to 9.00, and meanwhile, the overlooked, underappreciated, late-blossoming wallflower sneaks up with the the best performances in the last three cycles through the rotation! Who'd a thunk it! He's this year's Aaron Small! Or maybe Shawn Chicon? He's one or the other -- I'm just not quite sure which, yet. Still waiting for the other, though. And A-Rod has got two home runs in two games! If he can keep this up for just 116 more games . . . I don't ask for much . . . just a few minor miracles here and there.

Greg-

Amen on Rasner and I am cool with the sacrificing idea.

BTW- check out Cano's May #'s before you write him off.

NE Phillies Phan

Welcome to the site, I have always had a soft spot for the Phillies since I knew one of their owners growing up and got to meet a bunch of them as a kid.

Anyway, you are so right about Abreu. I don't know if "fear of walls" is a legitimate medical condition, but Abreu certainly has it!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

$MTCommentChallenge$

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.yankeesredsox.com/blog-mt/mt-tb.fcgi/438


Hosting by Yahoo!