Categories

« Timlin Back in the Fold | Main | My Turn to Feel Sick »

The Last Time The Twins Traded An Ace

He was 29, left-handed and had already won 112 games in the bigs. He was coming off of a Cy Young award and was one of the best pitchers in the game.

The main part of the package for him was one of the brightest prospects in the game having gone 12-4 with a 1.80ERA the previous season at AAA with 143 K's in 160 innings. He had made a nice start in the bigs the season before and entered the season with a decent chance to make the team out of camp. It didn't happen to the howls from the fans, but he continued his dominance at AAA going 7-4 with a 2.37 and 69K's in 87 innings. He had struggled in the majors after getting called up in July, but on that fateful trading deadline in 1989, there was no doubt that this guy would be a future star.

The Minnesota pitcher was Frank Viola of course who went to the Mets for five players Rick Aguilera, Kevin Tapani, Tim Drummond, Jack Savage and the aforementioned prospect, David West.

I was thinking about that deal today when I thought more about Hughes. I went back and read some news reports from the late 80's to check my memory and I think it is fair to compare the hype for Hughes today with the hype for West then. He was going to be the next big thing, the guy who would sit atop the Mets rotation and provide a dominant lefty to go alongside Dwight Gooden. (how's that for irony?)

But, the 1989 Mets were not patient. Injuries to Keith Hernandez and Dwight Gooden had them struggling along in late July and after their playoff loss in 88, they wanted to get back to October, so they pulled the trigger on their second blockbuster of the season. (In June they had sent Lenny Dykstra and Roger McDowell to Philadelphia for Juan Samuel)

Viola won 38 games for the Mets in almost 2 1/2 seasons before getting 3 years/$14 million from the Red Sox in free agency.

West ended up winning 31 games in his career and was out of baseball after pitching two innings for the 1998 Red Sox. The Twins definitely won the trade because Tapani became a big part of the rotation and Aguilera became one of the best closers in baseball.

I am not saying that history will repeat itself if the Yankees send Hughes to Minnesota for Santana, but I wanted to relate that tale for those of you preparing to climb out onto the ledge. If this trade happens, the way to judge it will be down the road when we see what happens with both teams. If the Yankees win the World Series because of Santana, will you really care what happens with Hughes? In 1989 it certainly looked like Viola would lead the Mets to the World Series and it didn't happen. Likewise, it was thought West was the best part of the trade and he wasn't. Our perceptions today could be very wrong, on both sides.

Comments

Yikes, Gammons leveled the boom on MLB and the Yankees (and to a lesser extent the Mets and Red Sox).

http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?name=gammons_peter

Gee, Gammons attacks the Yanks, there's a new story. I respect the guy, but other than Jeter and Cashman, he never has anything good to say about the Yankees. I forget, where is he from again?

It's nice that he doesn't mention that the Yankees will take around $70 million off the payroll after this season. And, despite the huge size of the deals to A-Rod, Posada and Mo, they will pay the three of them around $6.1 million more collectively than they did in 2007.

Oh yeah, Carl Pohland is worth $3 billion dollars yet 75% of his new stadium is being financed by the public and we are supposed to worry about how the Twins will compete?

I will fully admit that there are plenty of teams that can gripe out there, but this is not a balanced piece by Gammons at all.

If the Ynkees pull in $277 million a year, why should they noit put it into their payroll? If they don't pay the players, the ticket prce ain't comin' down, the owners would just pocket that money. I am all for luxury taxes and disincentives to high salaries, but caps are ridiculous. By the way, owners who pocket the luxury taxes instead of putting into the team are the ones Gammons should be writting about.

Grant, Gammons has written about the owners who have pocketed the tax money.

http://espn.go.com/gammons/s/2002/0831/1425569.html

Andy

I was struck by a number of things in (or not in) that essay and thanks for linking to it.

First, pretty much everything Gammons hoped for didn't come to fruition. I take no joy in that, I just wish he had continued to beat the same drum he did in 2002 and I think he has abandoned it.

Next, there is absolutely no mention of steroids. In fact, he praises Bonds, McGwire and Sosa. Weird to look at that now.

Lastly, how strange is it to read about a Yankees-Red Sox game in August of 2002 with Pedro and Mussina on the mound at Fenway where they were giving away tickets? I could add a smart-ass remark here, but let's just say things have changed a lot in five years.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

$MTCommentChallenge$

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.yankeesredsox.com/blog-mt/mt-tb.fcgi/266


Hosting by Yahoo!